GMAT作文:Argument范文精選(14)

            雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

            GMAT作文:Argument范文精選(14)

              為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了GMAT作文:Argument范文精選系列文章,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

              The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.

              First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.

              Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.

              As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.

              小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

              

              為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了GMAT作文:Argument范文精選系列文章,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

              The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.

              First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.

              Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.

              As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.

              小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

              

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 熟女少妇丰满一区二区| 国产凹凸在线一区二区| 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区蜜桃| 日本中文字幕在线视频一区| 国产精久久一区二区三区| 成人免费av一区二区三区| 好看的电影网站亚洲一区| 中文乱码人妻系列一区二区| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区亚洲视频1 | 日韩一区二区三区无码影院| 91精品福利一区二区| 久久国产精品一区| 亚洲AV无码国产一区二区三区| 农村人乱弄一区二区| 国产成人精品一区二三区在线观看| 成人国内精品久久久久一区| 色综合视频一区中文字幕| 久久国产精品无码一区二区三区| 国产AV天堂无码一区二区三区| 精品人妻中文av一区二区三区| 久久精品一区二区影院| 爆乳无码AV一区二区三区| 在线成人一区二区| 黑巨人与欧美精品一区| 免费无码VA一区二区三区| 人妻无码一区二区三区AV| 熟女精品视频一区二区三区| 一本大道东京热无码一区| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 日韩综合无码一区二区| 中文字幕日韩精品一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲综合一区在线观看| 亚洲av乱码一区二区三区| 毛片一区二区三区| 国产成人精品一区二区A片带套| 3d动漫精品一区视频在线观看| 亚洲香蕉久久一区二区三区四区| 乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费精品一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩精品一区二区三区毛片 | 一区二区三区福利|