GMAT作文:Argument范文精選(14)

            雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

            GMAT作文:Argument范文精選(14)

              為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了GMAT作文:Argument范文精選系列文章,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

              The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.

              First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.

              Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.

              As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.

              小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

              

              為了方便廣大考生更好的復習,綜合整理了GMAT作文:Argument范文精選系列文章,以供各位考生考試復習參考,希望對考生復習有所幫助。

              The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the views of protesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out that only 200 of the 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about proposed cuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part in this protest, the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning in this argument is flawed for two reasons.

              First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in the protest, these students views are unrepresentative of the entire student body. This assumption is unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were randomly selected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of the entire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting students were selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect the opinions of their colleagues.

              Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on campus or left for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their education. One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did not participate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the protesting students. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical connection between the students alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion reached by the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their education is unacceptable.

              As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the author would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some characteristic in common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as representative of the entire college.

              小編提醒:考生們可在日常生活中多讀范文,多練筆,培養出好的語感和邏輯,這樣才能在考試中寫出優秀的作文。

              

            主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产日韩亚洲一区| 日韩高清一区二区| 色窝窝免费一区二区三区| 国产一区二区视频免费| 亚洲一区二区影视| 老湿机一区午夜精品免费福利| 伊人色综合一区二区三区影院视频| 福利一区在线视频| 国产精品亚洲专区一区| 亚洲AV成人精品一区二区三区| 人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 不卡一区二区在线| 中文字幕在线一区二区三区| 高清一区高清二区视频| 在线不卡一区二区三区日韩| 无码人妻精一区二区三区| 69福利视频一区二区| 国产一区二区三区免费| 国产精品一区二区久久不卡 | 无码av免费一区二区三区试看| 亚洲国产成人久久一区WWW| 国产人妖在线观看一区二区| 国产成人精品一区二三区| 国产成人高清亚洲一区91| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文版| 国产欧美一区二区精品仙草咪 | 国产精品免费大片一区二区| 亚洲高清成人一区二区三区| 久久免费视频一区| 亚洲一区二区三区偷拍女厕| 无码少妇一区二区三区浪潮AV| 国产自产在线视频一区| 色国产精品一区在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 无码中文人妻在线一区 | 国产一区高清视频| 福利视频一区二区牛牛| 国产成人精品一区二三区在线观看| 国产观看精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区中文字幕| 精品人妻AV一区二区三区|